Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections

Shortcuts: COM:AN/B • COM:AN/P • COM:RFPP

• Community portal
  • introduction
• Help desk
• Village pump
  • copyright
  • proposals
  • technical
• Administrators' noticeboard
  • vandalism
  • user problems
  • blocks and protections

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reportswikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergencywikimedia.org.
Vandalism []	User problems []	Blocks and protections []	Other []
Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.	Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.	Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.	Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.
Archives
25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1	124, 123, 122, 121, 120, 119, 118, 117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1	41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1	101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

^{Translate this page}

Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.

purge Admin backlog

---

Copyright:

• Copyright violations: ~150
• Unfree Flickr files: ~0
• Recent unfree Flickr images: ~0
• No license since 19 August 2025: ~2
• No permission since 19 August 2025: ~9
• Media uploaded without a license as of 2025-08: ~199

Other:

• Duplicates: ~193
• Advertisements/spam: ~0
• Personal photos/selfies: ~55
• Other speedy deletions: ~521
• Categories for discussion: 84 months
• Media requiring a split up: ~0
• Requests for unblock: ~1
• Undeletion requests: ~11

Protected edit requests:

• Full protection: ~13
• Interface admin: ~12
• Technical: ~0
• Template protection: ~11
• Protection level: ~0

See also: DR, HMS, …

COMMONS DISCUSSION PAGES

• Commons Help desk
• Village pump (general discussion)
  • Copyright
  • Proposals
  • Technical
• Graphics and photography discussion
  • Photography critiques
  • Image improvement
    • Illustration workshop
    • Map workshop
    • Photography workshop
    • Video and sound workshop
• Categories for discussion
• Undeletion requests
• Deletion requests
• Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard
• Translators' noticeboard
• Work requests for bots

---

• Contact administrators
  • Vandalism
  • User problems (Dispute resolution)
  • Blocks and protections
• Bureaucrats' noticeboard
• CheckUser requests
• Oversight requests

---

• Telegram
• IRC ^webchat
• Commons mailing list (archive)
• Commons' bugs on Phabricator

Note

• For page protection requests, please state protection type, file name, and proposed protection time span. See also: Protection Policy.
• Before proposing a user be blocked, please familiarize yourself with the Commons' Blocking Policy.
• Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
• Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s). {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/B|thread=|reason=}} is available for this.
• Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.

Unicode data semi-protection

This discussion was archived without a proper resolution. tl;dr all of the data files under Category:Unicode Module Datasets should definitely be at the very least indefinitely semi-protected, either directly or through some indirect means, because of their (very) high visibility. — SURJECTION ^{/ T / C / L /} 21:11, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Looking at that discussion, it looks like we want to protect at the template editor level, but the user who requested protection has not gotten around to requesting that level of rights. - Jmabel ! talk 00:35, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

Protecting at the template editor level is fine too, at least for some of the data, but we shouldn't leave them unprotected until we get that sorted out. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. — SURJECTION ^{/ T / C / L /} 17:47, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done all protected at template editor level. That was tedious, we really ought to have a tool for mass protection. - Jmabel ! talk 21:24, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

@Jmabel Why? 😭 ToncianTaien (talk) 03:31, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Change it back to semi-protection right now! 😡 BashBuilder (talk) 05:01, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, I thought the conclusion at the linked discussion was that this should be protected at template editor level, and that certainly was my read of Surjection's request here. BashBuilder I will accept your interpretation and lower this to autopatrollers. Certainly no one below that level should be messing with these. This is going to take me another half-hour or so. If someone wants this changed yet again after that, ask someone other than me. - Jmabel ! talk 05:12, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done - Jmabel ! talk 05:45, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! I will upload files with Creative Commons and become an autopatroller soon. ToncianTaien (talk) 06:06, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Me too! I will upload over 1000 images with Creative Commons. BashBuilder (talk) 06:13, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

These two accounts are almost certainly operated by the same person who has socked extensively on en.wikt, but that's a whole another subject... — SURJECTION ^{/ T / C / L /} 08:59, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

@Surjection Those 2 accounts are not a sockpuppet in en.wiktionary.org. BiggCooker (talk) 13:56, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Nevermind, one of their accounts was blocked here too. Maybe a Commons CU could look at it. (I suspect the account that responded to me above is them, too. I've had to block dozens of their socks on en.wikt alone.) — SURJECTION ^{/ T / C / L /} 23:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

I have started a checkuser case, see Commons:Requests for checkuser#BiggCooker. Tvpuppy (talk) 13:08, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

So if BashBuilder and BiggCooker weren't legit, should this indeed be raised back to template editor? (Not that I'm volunteering to do the work yet again.) - Jmabel ! talk 18:25, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

I agree, I'll do it. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done, here's the script I used:

from pywikibot import config, Site, Category
from pywikibot.pagegenerators import CategorizedPageGenerator, PrefixingPageGenerator
from itertools import chain

config.put_throttle = 5
commonswiki = Site("commons", "commons")
pages = set(chain( # Get uncategorized pages under Data:Unicode data too, in case it was forgotten
   CategorizedPageGenerator(
      Category(commonswiki, "Category:Unicode_Module_Datasets")
   ),
   PrefixingPageGenerator("Data:Unicode_data"),
))

for page in pages:
    print(f"protecting {page}")
    page.protect(
        reason="High cross-wiki use, see [[Special:Permalink/1077265368#Unicode_data_semi-protection]] and linked discussions",
        protections={"edit": "templateeditor", "move": "templateeditor"},
    )

for page in pages:
    print(f"{page} has protections {page.protection()}")

print(f"total pages protected: {len(pages)}")

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Only 21 accounts are banned after CU-investigation, User:BashBuilder is one of them. Still  Support done protection to level "template editor" of all in Category:Unicode Module Datasets. Ping me if you need an edit and lack the right. Dusan has the right now too. Taylor 49 (talk) 18:02, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Sockpuppets

• شهم الشهم العمري (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• الظبع العمري (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• شهم السهم العمري (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user
• هزاع الحويطي (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user

These accounts are re-uploading the deleted files of globally locked user دامر العمري (talk · contribs). Marbletan (talk) 12:31, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done blocked and nuked these four plus two more I spotted with CheckUser. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 14:05, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

@The Squirrel Conspiracy: (or another admin). The user listed below appeared today and is re-uploading the same deleted files. Can you have a look? Marbletan (talk) 13:21, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

• ساطي المساد (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user

 Done The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:32, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

RPP

Template:NOIRLab request page protection.

Reason: 23,000 transclusions. Waddie96 (talk) 20:06, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done Semi-protected. Yann (talk) 16:17, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

👍 Waddie96 (talk) 20:29, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Block request for Hopeful2day

• Hopeful2day (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user has a multiyear history of uploading copyright violations and improperly licensed photos and continues to do so despite multiple talk page warnings ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5]) Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:58, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

 Comment Final warning sent, one file deleted. Yann (talk) 16:16, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks @Yann. @Pushingforward appears to be a related account; it has repeatedly uploaded the same copyrighted image that Hopeful2day has; flagging in case you want to take a look. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:27, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done I blocked Pushingforward indef. for socking. Yann (talk) 08:46, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

User:TS01800 and false claim of ownership at File:Thomas Sewell August 2025.jpg

TS01800, uploaded a file at File:Thomas Sewell August 2025.jpg and they claimed that the image is their own work (refer to Special:Diff/1076013160). They have gone on to reassert that it is their own work two more times at Special:Diff/1077081556 and Special:Diff/1077088119. This is contradicted by statements they have made on my user talk where they admit it is not their own work (refer to Special:Diff/1077086530). Can the file be protected so that they can't continually revert to make claims that it is their own work when it is not. TarnishedPath^talk 04:55, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

@TarnishedPath is disruptively editing my image, claiming that the source is a video on youtube with 4 views.

I own the copyright for the original video footage in question and @TarnishedPathis falsely stating otherwise TS01800 (talk) 04:58, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

You have clearly admitted that the image is not your own work and have reverted twice to reinsert claims that it is. TarnishedPath^talk 05:00, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Ok what would you be satisfied with then?

I get the person who originally took the video and then transferred the copyright to me, to submit a statement that they authorise the image (that they no longer own the copyright for) to be used?

Stop being disruptive TS01800 (talk) 05:03, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Also please consider that this user did the same thing with the only other image I have uploaded where he falsely copyright flagged (Special:Diff/1041864671) a selfie, claiming that the source was from some random twitter account.

@TarnishedPath is just being disruptive TS01800 (talk) 05:18, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

That other image was correctly deleted and only allowed back up after you submitted a VRT ticket. You need to dial back your combative language. TarnishedPath^talk 05:22, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

No, you got it taken down by citing an incorrect source. The same thing you are doing here TS01800 (talk) 05:23, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

@TS01800: The original creator of the video must be credited. They authorize its use with the ticket. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 05:27, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Ok, I will get them to also do that, thanks TS01800 (talk) 05:34, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

And you need to edit the file so that it states their name, not that it is your work. TarnishedPath^talk 05:58, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Ok, will do

Thanks for being so helpful TS01800 (talk) 06:13, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Pinging @Ziv as an involved admin. TarnishedPath^talk 05:02, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

@TarnishedPath, The file has an open VRT ticket, and its review is the responsibility of the trusted members of the VRT team. I'm not a VRT member, so I can't verify the information. Please give them some time, as this is also voluntary work, and if anything is incorrect with the information provided, they will suggest the image for deletion. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 05:19, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Block request for Rastapopoulos25

Rastapopoulos25 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) (assign permissions)

@Rastapopoulos25 has a long history of uploading copyrighted work and continues to do so despite a prior block in 2024. This user is not here to contribute positively to the project. Moumou82 (talk) 08:25, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done Blocked for a week, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 08:37, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Request file protection.

File:Breezeicons-actions-22-help-about.svg Request file protection.

576,655 transclusions. Waddie96 (talk) 09:38, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

@Waddie96:  Done —Matrix(!) _{ping one}^{when replying} {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 10:04, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

The omagol official

• The omagol official (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user. This user is an obvious sock of globally locked Omagol (talk · contribs). He recreated the same repeatedly-deleted category (Category:Oviul maruf) as previous socks. See Category:Sockpuppets of Omagol. Marbletan (talk) 17:17, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done Blocked, category deleted. Yann (talk) 17:28, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Dnerm

• Dnerm (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user

No meaningful contributions other than nudity, personally think most of their files could be speedied as vandalism per Com:Nudity. Takipoint123 (💬) 05:23, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

I want to express some kind of  Support to this report. I concur in that a lot of his uploads were unsuitable per COM:Nudity, leading me to open Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dnerm. Now, this uploader went and nominated himself the files I purposefully left out of the DR, as I thought that those not included were acceptable. Commons:Deletion requests/File:A photo of a person defecating.jpg is a DR about a photo that IMHO had some kind of educational value, for instance.

As it stand now, the only files not deleted are those in my mass DR. The others were put up for elimination by the uploader. I could see that behaviour either as wish to unbind himself from Commons or as an act of defiance, hence my initially stated "kind of support". Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 06:01, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Personally I'm not too sure what they're up to either with the self-DRs. They've already blocked at Kowiki for vandalism [6] and also repeatedly uploaded after their warning at the talkpage too. If anything I would want them to make a good explanation if they could contribute to anything non-sexual in nature. Takipoint123 (💬) 06:33, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

 Done Indef as NOTHERE. As for the self-DRs, it's exhibitionism. Happens all the time. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:46, 26 August 2025 (UTC)